About The Author
Marc Charisse is the editor of The Evening Sun. Dr. Charisse has a Ph.D. in First Amendment law and history, and has taught communication law and constitutional law at the University of Washington in Seattle and Jacksonville University in Jacksonville, Fla. Charisse can be reached at mcharisse@eveningsun.com.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- aka Fern on Can we be safe in a free society?
- aka Fern on Can we be safe in a free society?
- Kevin Benner on Can we be safe in a free society?
- Marc Charisse on Can we be safe in a free society?
- Marc Charisse on Can we be safe in a free society?
Tags
14th amendment alvarez campaign finance campaign financing Chief Justice John Robers Citizens United constitution constitution; gun control; second amendment constitutional law constitution law free speech first amendment first amendment free speech gay marriage graphic images Gun control health care health care; constitution; supreme court helath care vote ideology Keviun Bleyer medal of honor Newton shootings Obamacare politics Privacy gps constitutional law jones v. US right to anonymity right to lie Roberts court second amendment supreme court Supreme Court Fourth Amendment drugs marijuana constitution law Supreme Court immigration charisse The Daily Show tobacco advertising tobacco first amendmentArchives
Meta
Tag Archives: supreme court
In defense of ‘traditional’ marriage
Even though I grew up in Las Vegas, I’ve never been much of a betting man. But if I were, I’d be willing to lay 2 to 1 odds that the Supreme Court will strike down the federal Defense of … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged 14th amendment, constitutional law, gay marriage, supreme court
Leave a comment
Can we be safe in a free society?
As happens every time there’s a mass shooting – a tragedy of increasing frequency, it seems – gun dealers nationwide reported a spike in sales in the days following the terrible slaughter this month in Connecticut. The experts tell us … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged constitutional law, Gun control, Newton shootings, second amendment, supreme court
6 Comments
A right to remain anonymous
I’m Marc Charisse and I approved this message. I don’t have much choice, actually, working as I do in a profession that puts a premium on standing behind what you believe in by putting your name on it. Most newspapers, … Continue reading
Supreme Court recognizes a ‘right’ to lie
While the health-care ruling last Thursday was getting all the attention, the Supreme Court quietly decided a First Amendment case that recognizes a right to lie. Or, more accurately, recognizes a right to be free from government prosecution for lying … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged first amendment, free speech, right to lie, supreme court
Leave a comment
Court less divided than you might think
One of the most common complaints I hear at our regular Tuesday constitutional law lunches is that the Supreme Court is too often divided, 5-4, along predictably ideological lines. That suggests, of course, that the justices’ opinions are determined more … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged constitutional law, ideology, politics, Roberts court, supreme court
Leave a comment
Presenting the Great Prognosticator
OK, I was wrong about the Supreme Court’s vote on health care. For months, I’ve been confidently predicting a 6-3 vote upholding the law. But I was right on about Chief Justice John Roberts, who I insisted would do the … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged Chief Justice John Robers, constitutional law, helath care vote, Obamacare, supreme court
2 Comments
More speech always better than less
We started meeting a couple of years ago in downtown Hanover every Tuesday, ostensibly to debate the big issues of constitutional law. But the weekly lunches at the Reader’s Cafe are really civil discussions of law, local politics, the newspaper … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged campaign financing, Citizens United, first amendment, supreme court
Leave a comment
How would Justice Holmes vote on health care?
As the Supreme Court begins its second day of oral arguments on the national health-care law, I’m reflecting back to Holmes’ famous dissent in Lochner v. New York. The majority in that infamous decision ruled that a constitutional “right to … Continue reading
Court seems torn over “right to lie”
Conventional wisdom is that it’s always risky to read too much into what side individual justices appear to take in oral arguments before the Supreme Court. The justices can push the side they disagree with in hopes of spotting holes … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Tagged alvarez, first amendment, free speech, medal of honor, right to lie, supreme court
Leave a comment
Court won’t hear cross case
It’s always dangerous to read too much into Supreme Court decisions not to hear a given case. But this 8-1 vote suggests to me some things are settled law and beyond politics: WASHINGTON (AP)– The Supreme Court won’t hear an … Continue reading
